Skip to content
Assaylist
Sage People logo

Sage People

Verified listing

Cloud HR and people system for larger organisations, built on Salesforce

4.1Based on 298 reviews
Visit website

Ratings by dimension

  • Ease of use4.0
  • Value4.1
  • Support4.0
  • Features4.0

Rating distribution

  • 5 stars138
  • 4 stars96
  • 3 stars36
  • 2 stars21
  • 1 star7

Filter reviews

Verified reviews for Sage People

298 reviews matching your filters

Callum Halliwell

Director · 11-50 employees · Veterinary

United Kingdom
4.0

10 Dec 2024

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it. Only real gripe is that the administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Pros

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it.

Cons

The administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for Less than 6 months9 found this helpful

Priya Thornley

Office manager · 1-10 employees · Legal services

United Kingdom
2.0

9 Dec 2024

Multi country was the deciding factor

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it, and no UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping. Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Ease of use
2.0
Value for money
2.0
Customer service
1.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for Less than 6 months1 found this helpful

Megan Sandhu

Management accountant · 201-500 employees · IT services

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
4.0

2 Dec 2024

Multi country was the deciding factor

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it. Only real gripe is that cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Pros

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it.

Cons

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for Less than 6 months17 found this helpful

Olivia Baptiste

Owner · 11-50 employees · Fitness and leisure

United Kingdom
3.0

29 Nov 2024

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong. That said, more system than we needed at 300 people and implementation was a nine month project.

Pros

The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong.

Cons

More system than we needed at 300 people.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
2.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for 1-2 years26 found this helpful

Claire Iqbal

HR manager · 201-500 employees · Healthcare

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
5.0

22 Nov 2024

Analytics our board actually uses

Running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers. The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong.

Pros

Running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers.

Cons

No UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years25 found this helpful

Stephen Trelawny

Founder · 11-50 employees · Manufacturing

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
5.0

22 Nov 2024

Multi country was the deciding factor

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong.

Pros

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen.

Cons

No UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 6-12 months1 found this helpful

Christopher Ellery

Finance manager · 51-200 employees · IT services

United Kingdom
4.0

16 Nov 2024

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round. Only real gripe is that no UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

No UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 6-12 months11 found this helpful

Robert Wexford

Systems accountant · 1000+ employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom
4.0

9 Nov 2024

Powerful, and a real project

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen, and configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round. Implementation was a nine month project, but we live with it.

Pros

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen.

Cons

Implementation was a nine month project.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for 6-12 months22 found this helpful

Mark Baptiste

HR manager · 51-200 employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom
5.0

5 Nov 2024

Good fit above 500 people

The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong, and configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round. No complaints so far.

Pros

The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong.

Cons

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 6-12 months37 found this helpful

Ian Devlin

Practice manager · 1-10 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom
5.0

29 Oct 2024

Multi country was the deciding factor

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round. The reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

The administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 6-12 months4 found this helpful