Sage People

Verified listing

Cloud HR and people system for larger organisations, built on Salesforce

4.1Based on 298 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use4.0
Value4.1
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
138
4 stars
96
3 stars
36
2 stars
21
1 star
7

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for Sage People

298 reviews matching your filters

Fiona Colquhoun

Owner · 1-10 employees · Construction

United Kingdom

5.0

22 Feb 2025

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

Running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers, and configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round. No complaints so far.

Pros

Running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers.

Cons

Implementation was a nine month project.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months31 found this helpful

Megan Halliwell

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

5.0

18 Feb 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it, and running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers. No complaints so far.

Pros

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it.

Cons

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months2 found this helpful

Eleanor Thornley

Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Charity and non-profit

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

17 Feb 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round, and workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. The administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team, but we live with it.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

The administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years23 found this helpful

Paul Bhatti

Office manager · 11-50 employees · Food and beverage

United Kingdom

5.0

14 Feb 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round, and the reporting on attrition and diversity is genuinely strong. No complaints so far.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

Cost is enterprise and the licence is only part of it.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months37 found this helpful

Daniel Trelawny

Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

5.0

10 Feb 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round, and running four countries in one system was the requirement and it delivers. No complaints so far.

Pros

Configurable workflows matched our process rather than the other way round.

Cons

Implementation was a nine month project.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months21 found this helpful

Mark Lockhart

Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Education

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

4 Feb 2025

Powerful, and a real project

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. Only real gripe is that the administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Pros

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen.

Cons

The administrative overhead is heavy for a mid sized HR team.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years12 found this helpful

Amy Devlin

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Charity and non-profit

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

2.0

1 Feb 2025

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

More system than we needed at 300 people, and no UK payroll, so the integration needs proper scoping. Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen.

Cons

More system than we needed at 300 people.

Ease of use: 2.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for 1-2 years4 found this helpful

Jodie Dunmore

Practice manager · 1-10 employees · Accounting

United Kingdom

4.0

31 Jan 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. Only real gripe is that more system than we needed at 300 people.

Pros

Workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen.

Cons

More system than we needed at 300 people.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 6-12 months

Simon Rhodes

HR director · 1000+ employees · Professional services

United Kingdom

4.0

29 Jan 2025

Enterprise HR, enterprise effort

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it, and workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. More system than we needed at 300 people, but we live with it.

Pros

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it.

Cons

More system than we needed at 300 people.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for Less than 6 months23 found this helpful

Amy Quinn

Company secretary · 201-500 employees · Food and beverage

United Kingdom

5.0

23 Jan 2025

Analytics our board actually uses

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it, and workforce analytics gave our board data it had never seen. No complaints so far.

Pros

Sitting on Salesforce meant our platform team could support it.

Cons

Implementation was a nine month project.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 1-2 years33 found this helpful