Sage 200

Verified listing

The step up from Sage 50 for UK businesses that have outgrown small business accounting

4.1Based on 293 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use4.0
Value4.0
Support3.9
Features4.1

Rating distribution

5 stars
131
4 stars
97
3 stars
37
2 stars
21
1 star
7

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for Sage 200

293 reviews matching your filters

Daniel Hargreaves

Owner · 11-50 employees · Manufacturing

United Kingdom

2.0

4 Dec 2024

One system for stock and finance

The interface is capable rather than pleasant, and training took longer than we budgeted. Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work.

Cons

The interface is capable rather than pleasant.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 1.0
Customer service: 1.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for 6-12 months1 found this helpful

Laura Iqbal

Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Hospitality

United Kingdom

4.0

3 Dec 2024

Partner made the difference

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers, and our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well. Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent, but we live with it.

Pros

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers.

Cons

Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 2+ years7 found this helpful

Aisha Iqbal

Systems accountant · 501-1000 employees · Marketing and advertising

United Kingdom

1.0

1 Dec 2024

Partner made the difference

Outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully. Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent. Looking at alternatives.

Pros

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Cons

Outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully.

Ease of use: 1.0
Value for money: 1.0
Customer service: 1.0
Functionality: 1.0

Used for Less than 6 months16 found this helpful

Neil Wexford

Founder · 1-10 employees · Food and beverage

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

3.0

15 Nov 2024

Scaled with us properly

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform. That said, outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully and training took longer than we budgeted.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 1-2 years17 found this helpful

Aisha Holloway

Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Hospitality

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

13 Nov 2024

Scaled with us properly

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers. Only real gripe is that cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Pros

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers.

Cons

Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 6-12 months3 found this helpful

Sophie Adeyemi

Finance manager · 201-500 employees · Education

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

5.0

12 Nov 2024

Capable, not beautiful

Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work. It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Pros

Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work.

Cons

Customisation means upgrades need testing every time.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months33 found this helpful

Craig Okonkwo

Office manager · 1-10 employees · Food and beverage

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

1.0

6 Nov 2024

Capable, not beautiful

Training took longer than we budgeted. Customisation means upgrades need testing every time. Looking at alternatives.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Training took longer than we budgeted.

Ease of use: 1.0
Value for money: 1.0
Customer service: 1.0
Functionality: 1.0

Used for Less than 6 months3 found this helpful

Mohammed Corrigan

Founder · 1-10 employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom

4.0

6 Nov 2024

Capable, not beautiful

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform, and finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers. Customisation means upgrades need testing every time, but we live with it.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Customisation means upgrades need testing every time.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 6-12 months27 found this helpful

Simon Kowalski

Owner · 11-50 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

5.0

2 Nov 2024

Good mid market fit

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well. Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work.

Pros

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Cons

Outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months27 found this helpful

Simon Halliwell

Director · 11-50 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

5.0

23 Oct 2024

One system for stock and finance

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform. Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Training took longer than we budgeted.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 2+ years29 found this helpful