Skip to content
QuickFile logo

QuickFile

Verified listing

A British built accounting package that is genuinely free below 1,000 ledger entries

Ratings by dimension

  • Ease of use3.9
  • Value3.9
  • Support3.9
  • Features3.9

Rating distribution

  • 5 stars97
  • 4 stars96
  • 3 stars36
  • 2 stars18
  • 1 star12

Filter reviews

Verified reviews for QuickFile

259 reviews matching your filters

Charlotte Middleton

Founder · 11-50 employees · Property and lettings

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
2.0

22 Aug 2025

Great value for a landlord

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere, and it is functional rather than pleasant to look at. Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
2.0
Customer service
2.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for 1-2 years33 found this helpful

David Hargreaves

Group financial controller · 1000+ employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom
1.0

21 Aug 2025

Great value for a landlord

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere. The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription. Looking at alternatives.

Pros

MTD VAT returns submit without any drama.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
1.0
Value for money
1.0
Customer service
1.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for 1-2 years20 found this helpful

Eleanor Baptiste

Office manager · 11-50 employees · Construction

United Kingdom
3.0

19 Aug 2025

Does the job for nothing

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. That said, bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year and the interface shows its age against Xero.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

Bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year.

Ease of use
2.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
2.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for Less than 6 months31 found this helpful

Amy Trelawny

Bookkeeper · 11-50 employees · Fitness and leisure

United Kingdom
4.0

9 Aug 2025

Great value for a landlord

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. Only real gripe is that the Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 6-12 months22 found this helpful

Christopher Okonkwo

Owner · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
4.0

8 Aug 2025

Dated but capable

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable, and unlimited users on every plan, which even the paid rivals rarely offer. Bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year, but we live with it.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

Bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years39 found this helpful

David Wexford

Management accountant · 51-200 employees · Healthcare

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
5.0

7 Aug 2025

Actually free, and it works

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 2+ years35 found this helpful

Alan Osei

Operations manager · 201-500 employees · Property and lettings

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
3.0

6 Aug 2025

Unbeatable for a micro business

Mixed. It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid, but the interface shows its age against Xero.

Pros

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid.

Cons

The interface shows its age against Xero.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
3.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for Less than 6 months1 found this helpful

Helen Fairbanks

Financial controller · 201-500 employees · Professional services

United Kingdom
5.0

4 Aug 2025

Sixty pounds a year, not a month

Unlimited users on every plan, which even the paid rivals rarely offer, and it is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid. No complaints so far.

Pros

Unlimited users on every plan, which even the paid rivals rarely offer.

Cons

Bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years12 found this helpful

Simon Middleton

Director · 1-10 employees · Engineering

United Kingdom
5.0

4 Aug 2025

Great value for a landlord

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid, and sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. No complaints so far.

Pros

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid.

Cons

The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years25 found this helpful

Amy Stroud

Payroll manager · 51-200 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom
3.0

31 Jul 2025

Sixty pounds a year, not a month

Mixed. Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable, but bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

Bank feeds are a paid extra, though only fifteen pounds a year.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
2.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for 6-12 months32 found this helpful