IRIS Staffology Payroll

Verified listing

IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee

4.1Based on 223 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use3.9
Value4.0
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
99
4 stars
71
3 stars
30
2 stars
17
1 star
6

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for IRIS Staffology Payroll

223 reviews matching your filters

Richard Ellery

HR manager · 51-200 employees · Accounting

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

4 Sep 2025

Good cloud engine

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. Only real gripe is that it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for Less than 6 months35 found this helpful

David Lockhart

HR manager · 201-500 employees · Marketing and advertising

United Kingdom

4.0

31 Aug 2025

Payslip pricing fits our swings

It scaled with us without a change of platform. Only real gripe is that the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 1-2 years37 found this helpful

Richard Kaur

HR manager · 201-500 employees · Construction

United Kingdom

3.0

28 Aug 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

Mixed. It scaled with us without a change of platform, but the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 2.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years12 found this helpful

Richard Dunmore

Director · 1-10 employees · Education

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

28 Aug 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, but we live with it.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for Less than 6 months23 found this helpful

Hannah Adeyemi

Office manager · 11-50 employees · Engineering

United Kingdom

4.0

27 Aug 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for Less than 6 months28 found this helpful

Martin Ainsley

Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

4.0

27 Aug 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. Only real gripe is that the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for Less than 6 months36 found this helpful

Aisha Ellery

Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Veterinary

United Kingdom

5.0

22 Aug 2025

Good cloud engine

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years

Adam Devlin

Head of finance · 1000+ employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

4.0

16 Aug 2025

Payslip pricing fits our swings

It scaled with us without a change of platform. Only real gripe is that the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years8 found this helpful

Neil Holloway

HR manager · 201-500 employees · Marketing and advertising

United Kingdom

4.0

13 Aug 2025

Reliable RTI every month

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year, but we live with it.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 1-2 years6 found this helpful

Nicola Ellery

Owner · 1-10 employees · Healthcare

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

5.0

9 Aug 2025

Good cloud engine

It scaled with us without a change of platform. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months7 found this helpful