IRIS Staffology Payroll

Verified listing

IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee

4.1Based on 223 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use3.9
Value4.0
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
99
4 stars
71
3 stars
30
2 stars
17
1 star
6

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for IRIS Staffology Payroll

223 reviews matching your filters

Sophie Corrigan

Office manager · 1-10 employees · Professional services

United Kingdom

5.0

30 Dec 2025

Great API for embedding payroll

It scaled with us without a change of platform, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months35 found this helpful

Christopher Middleton

Owner · 11-50 employees · Marketing and advertising

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

29 Dec 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Only real gripe is that the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for Less than 6 months9 found this helpful

Thomas Ashworth

Financial controller · 201-500 employees · Hospitality

United Kingdom

4.0

29 Dec 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months35 found this helpful

Michael Trelawny

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Retail

United Kingdom

5.0

26 Dec 2025

Great API for embedding payroll

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for Less than 6 months

Zoe Radcliffe

Payroll manager · 51-200 employees · Education

United Kingdom

4.0

26 Dec 2025

Payslip pricing fits our swings

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, but we live with it.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 1-2 years3 found this helpful

Bethany Bhatti

Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom

4.0

26 Dec 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year, but we live with it.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 6-12 months20 found this helpful

Nicola Thornley

Company secretary · 51-200 employees · Legal services

United Kingdom

3.0

25 Dec 2025

Great API for embedding payroll

It scaled with us without a change of platform. That said, they hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for Less than 6 months12 found this helpful

Megan Vaughan

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Retail

United Kingdom

4.0

22 Dec 2025

Good cloud engine

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll, but we live with it.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 6-12 months11 found this helpful

Fiona Colquhoun

Management accountant · 51-200 employees · Fitness and leisure

United Kingdom

2.0

20 Dec 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, and they hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year. Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for Less than 6 months27 found this helpful

Kevin Adeyemi

Finance business partner · 1000+ employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

4.0

18 Dec 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year, but we live with it.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 2+ years26 found this helpful