IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee
223 reviews matching your filters
Fiona Bramley
Founder · 1-10 employees · Engineering
13 Mar 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. No complaints so far.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Megan Thornley
Sole trader · 1-10 employees · IT services
3 Mar 2026
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Megan Pemberton
HR manager · 51-200 employees · Engineering
3 Mar 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, but we live with it.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Simon Fairbanks
Payroll manager · 51-200 employees · Healthcare
2 Mar 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Freya Marsden
Founder · 1-10 employees · Recruitment
25 Feb 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform. That said, some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools and the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Neil Bhatti
Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Retail
21 Feb 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Claire Radcliffe
Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Food and beverage
20 Feb 2026
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll, but we live with it.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Robert Radcliffe
Owner · 11-50 employees · Healthcare
18 Feb 2026
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, but we live with it.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Callum Radcliffe
Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Professional services
11 Feb 2026
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
James Bhatti
Finance manager · 51-200 employees · Logistics and transport
31 Jan 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.