IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee
223 reviews matching your filters
Thomas Marsden
Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Accounting
8 Jul 2024
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Louise Rhodes
Sole trader · 11-50 employees · Charity and non-profit
7 Jul 2024
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. No complaints so far.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Sophie Trelawny
Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Property and lettings
7 Jul 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Aisha Iqbal
Office manager · 11-50 employees · Education
4 Jul 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Daniel Cavendish
Head of finance · 1000+ employees · Accounting
4 Jul 2024
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll, and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools. It scaled with us without a change of platform, which is about the only positive.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Christopher Ashworth
Office manager · 11-50 employees · Professional services
4 Jul 2024
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. No complaints so far.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Mohammed Osei
Group financial controller · 1000+ employees · Veterinary
2 Jul 2024
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Rachel Mackenzie
Operations manager · 51-200 employees · Construction
26 Jun 2024
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, which is about the only positive.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Robert Whitfield
Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Professional services
24 Jun 2024
Mixed. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, but it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Gareth Whitfield
Head of payroll · 1000+ employees · Food and beverage
13 Jun 2024
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.