IRIS Staffology Payroll

Verified listing

IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee

4.1Based on 223 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use3.9
Value4.0
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
99
4 stars
71
3 stars
30
2 stars
17
1 star
6

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for IRIS Staffology Payroll

223 reviews matching your filters

Craig Fairbanks

Management accountant · 201-500 employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom

4.0

3 Sep 2024

Priced for variable headcounts

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Only real gripe is that some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 6-12 months9 found this helpful

Owen Holloway

Operations manager · 51-200 employees · Education

United Kingdom

5.0

1 Sep 2024

Good cloud engine

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 2+ years11 found this helpful

Alan Fairbanks

Director · 11-50 employees · Property and lettings

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

3.0

31 Aug 2024

Solid IRIS compliance

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. That said, they hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 2+ years38 found this helpful

Freya Dunmore

Director · 1-10 employees · Engineering

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

30 Aug 2024

Good cloud engine

It scaled with us without a change of platform, and paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year, but we live with it.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 2+ years10 found this helpful

Callum Mackenzie

Finance manager · 201-500 employees · Legal services

United Kingdom

5.0

28 Aug 2024

Priced for variable headcounts

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 1-2 years4 found this helpful

Megan Okonkwo

Owner · 1-10 employees · Food and beverage

United Kingdom

3.0

28 Aug 2024

Great API for embedding payroll

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. That said, the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years38 found this helpful

Charlotte Radcliffe

Practice manager · 1-10 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom

4.0

28 Aug 2024

Good cloud engine

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Only real gripe is that it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 1-2 years10 found this helpful

Mark Adeyemi

Operations manager · 51-200 employees · Recruitment

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

2.0

27 Aug 2024

Good cloud engine

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 1.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for Less than 6 months31 found this helpful

James Baptiste

Founder · 1-10 employees · Accounting

United Kingdom

5.0

26 Aug 2024

Priced for variable headcounts

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months19 found this helpful

Craig Radcliffe

Bookkeeper · 11-50 employees · Wholesale

United Kingdom

3.0

25 Aug 2024

Good cloud engine

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. That said, it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 2.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for 1-2 years35 found this helpful