IRIS Staffology Payroll

Verified listing

IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee

4.1Based on 223 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use3.9
Value4.0
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
99
4 stars
71
3 stars
30
2 stars
17
1 star
6

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for IRIS Staffology Payroll

223 reviews matching your filters

Stephen Kaur

Director · 1-10 employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom

5.0

25 Oct 2024

Great API for embedding payroll

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months22 found this helpful

Craig Stroud

Director · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

3.0

19 Oct 2024

Solid IRIS compliance

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. That said, they hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 6-12 months39 found this helpful

Craig Ferreira

Founder · 1-10 employees · Manufacturing

United Kingdom

4.0

15 Oct 2024

Payslip pricing fits our swings

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months12 found this helpful

Louise Bhatti

Systems accountant · 1000+ employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom

3.0

15 Oct 2024

Good cloud engine

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. That said, some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools and the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 1-2 years15 found this helpful

Neil Adeyemi

Finance manager · 51-200 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

5.0

11 Oct 2024

Great API for embedding payroll

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months24 found this helpful

Sophie Wexford

Sole trader · 11-50 employees · Property and lettings

United Kingdom

3.0

11 Oct 2024

Great API for embedding payroll

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. That said, the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 2.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 1-2 years16 found this helpful

Alan Ashworth

Company secretary · 51-200 employees · Manufacturing

United Kingdom

1.0

7 Oct 2024

Priced for variable headcounts

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally. Looking at alternatives.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 1.0
Value for money: 1.0
Customer service: 1.0
Functionality: 1.0

Used for 6-12 months11 found this helpful

Mark Iqbal

Practice manager · 1-10 employees · Recruitment

United Kingdom

4.0

20 Sep 2024

Reliable RTI every month

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. Only real gripe is that some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 6-12 months8 found this helpful

Louise Radcliffe

Head of finance · 1000+ employees · Wholesale

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

5.0

19 Sep 2024

Great API for embedding payroll

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years29 found this helpful

Olivia Sinclair

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

4.0

7 Sep 2024

Priced for variable headcounts

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Only real gripe is that some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 4.0
Customer service: 4.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 6-12 months19 found this helpful