IRIS Staffology Payroll

Verified listing

IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee

4.1Based on 223 reviews

Visit website

Ratings by dimension

Ease of use3.9
Value4.0
Support4.0
Features4.0

Rating distribution

5 stars
99
4 stars
71
3 stars
30
2 stars
17
1 star
6

Filter reviews

Country

Industry

Company size

How long used

Sort by

Verified reviews for IRIS Staffology Payroll

223 reviews matching your filters

Michael Radcliffe

Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

2.0

4 Jun 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year, and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 1.0
Customer service: 1.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for 6-12 months23 found this helpful

Rachel Halliwell

Payroll manager · 201-500 employees · Wholesale

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

4.0

29 May 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

It scaled with us without a change of platform, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.

Pros

It scaled with us without a change of platform.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for Less than 6 months31 found this helpful

Katie Ferreira

Office manager · 1-10 employees · Accounting

United Kingdom

5.0

27 May 2025

Reliable RTI every month

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 1-2 years36 found this helpful

Helen Ainsley

Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Fitness and leisure

United Kingdom

3.0

25 May 2025

Reliable RTI every month

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. That said, the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 3.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for 6-12 months23 found this helpful

Laura Ashworth

Office manager · 1-10 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom

3.0

18 May 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

Mixed. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, but some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.

Ease of use: 2.0
Value for money: 3.0
Customer service: 3.0
Functionality: 3.0

Used for Less than 6 months12 found this helpful

Thomas Fairbanks

Operations manager · 201-500 employees · Veterinary

United Kingdom

5.0

2 May 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 2+ years21 found this helpful

Ruth Quinn

Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Accounting

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom

5.0

24 Apr 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Pros

Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 4.0

Used for 2+ years20 found this helpful

Simon Colquhoun

Director · 11-50 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom

5.0

24 Apr 2025

Solid IRIS compliance

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Pros

The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.

Cons

They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.

Ease of use: 5.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 6-12 months33 found this helpful

Callum Pemberton

Director · 11-50 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom

2.0

18 Apr 2025

Priced for variable headcounts

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll, and it is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally. RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, which is about the only positive.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.

Ease of use: 1.0
Value for money: 2.0
Customer service: 2.0
Functionality: 2.0

Used for Less than 6 months31 found this helpful

Neil Lockhart

Company secretary · 51-200 employees · Retail

United Kingdom

5.0

3 Apr 2025

Reliable RTI every month

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.

Pros

RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.

Cons

It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.

Ease of use: 4.0
Value for money: 5.0
Customer service: 5.0
Functionality: 5.0

Used for 1-2 years5 found this helpful