Skip to content
Sage 200 logo

Sage 200

Verified listing

The step up from Sage 50 for UK businesses that have outgrown small business accounting

Ratings by dimension

  • Ease of use4.0
  • Value4.0
  • Support3.9
  • Features4.1

Rating distribution

  • 5 stars131
  • 4 stars97
  • 3 stars37
  • 2 stars21
  • 1 star7

Filter reviews

Verified reviews for Sage 200

293 reviews matching your filters

James Cavendish

Systems accountant · 1000+ employees · Hospitality

United Kingdom
2.0

20 May 2024

One system for stock and finance

Customisation means upgrades need testing every time, and training took longer than we budgeted. It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform, which is about the only positive.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Customisation means upgrades need testing every time.

Ease of use
2.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
2.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for 6-12 months10 found this helpful

Adam Halliwell

Group financial controller · 501-1000 employees · Professional services

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
5.0

15 May 2024

Capable, not beautiful

Multi company consolidation without the overhead of a tier one ERP. It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Pros

Multi company consolidation without the overhead of a tier one ERP.

Cons

Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years31 found this helpful

Hannah Whitfield

Finance director · 501-1000 employees · Logistics and transport

United Kingdom
5.0

15 May 2024

One system for stock and finance

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform, and finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers. No complaints so far.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years28 found this helpful

Craig Ferreira

Bookkeeper · 11-50 employees · Manufacturing

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
3.0

11 May 2024

Scaled with us properly

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well. That said, training took longer than we budgeted and cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Pros

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Cons

Training took longer than we budgeted.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for 6-12 months1 found this helpful

Simon Dunmore

Practice manager · 1-10 employees · Fitness and leisure

United Kingdom
4.0

5 May 2024

One system for stock and finance

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform. Only real gripe is that training took longer than we budgeted.

Pros

It scaled with us from 30 staff to 140 without a replatform.

Cons

Training took longer than we budgeted.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
3.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 2+ years36 found this helpful

Hannah Bramley

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Retail

United Kingdom
3.0

5 May 2024

Partner made the difference

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well. That said, customisation means upgrades need testing every time and outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully.

Pros

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Cons

Customisation means upgrades need testing every time.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
3.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for 6-12 months13 found this helpful

Rebecca Lockhart

Bookkeeper · 11-50 employees · Hospitality

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
5.0

30 Apr 2024

Capable, not beautiful

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers, and our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well. No complaints so far.

Pros

Finance, stock and the sales desk finally work from the same numbers.

Cons

The interface is capable rather than pleasant.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 2+ years11 found this helpful

Callum Hargreaves

Owner · 1-10 employees · Education

United Kingdom
5.0

23 Apr 2024

One system for stock and finance

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well, and manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work. No complaints so far.

Pros

Our partner understood distribution and the implementation went well.

Cons

Cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for Less than 6 months12 found this helpful

David Devlin

Financial controller · 201-500 employees · Logistics and transport

United Kingdom
5.0

23 Apr 2024

The step up from Sage 50 we needed

Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work, and multi company consolidation without the overhead of a tier one ERP. No complaints so far.

Pros

Manufacturing and project accounting in one place suits how we work.

Cons

Outcomes vary hugely by implementer, pick carefully.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for Less than 6 months25 found this helpful

Katie Ainsley

Founder · 1-10 employees · Manufacturing

United Kingdom
2.0

19 Apr 2024

One system for stock and finance

The interface is capable rather than pleasant, and cost depends entirely on the partner and it is not transparent. Multi company consolidation without the overhead of a tier one ERP, which is about the only positive.

Pros

Multi company consolidation without the overhead of a tier one ERP.

Cons

The interface is capable rather than pleasant.

Ease of use
2.0
Value for money
2.0
Customer service
2.0
Functionality
2.0
Used for 6-12 months17 found this helpful