Skip to content
QuickFile logo

QuickFile

Verified listing

A British built accounting package that is genuinely free below 1,000 ledger entries

Ratings by dimension

  • Ease of use3.9
  • Value3.9
  • Support3.9
  • Features3.9

Rating distribution

  • 5 stars97
  • 4 stars96
  • 3 stars36
  • 2 stars18
  • 1 star12

Filter reviews

Verified reviews for QuickFile

259 reviews matching your filters

Gareth Mackenzie

Group financial controller · 1000+ employees · Wholesale

United Kingdom
4.0

14 Aug 2024

Sixty pounds a year, not a month

Over four hundred integrations meant our shop connected fine. Only real gripe is that the interface shows its age against Xero.

Pros

Over four hundred integrations meant our shop connected fine.

Cons

The interface shows its age against Xero.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 1-2 years28 found this helpful

Craig Sandhu

Director · 1-10 employees · Wholesale

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
4.0

14 Aug 2024

Does the job for nothing

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of, and sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription, but we live with it.

Pros

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of.

Cons

The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 2+ years28 found this helpful

Michael Devlin

Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom
4.0

13 Aug 2024

Does the job for nothing

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable, and it is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid. No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere, but we live with it.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for Less than 6 months7 found this helpful

Mark Wexford

Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Logistics and transport

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
4.0

12 Aug 2024

Dated but capable

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of, and sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. It is functional rather than pleasant to look at, but we live with it.

Pros

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of.

Cons

It is functional rather than pleasant to look at.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Used for 1-2 years7 found this helpful

Fiona Nasir

Head of finance · 501-1000 employees · Manufacturing

United Kingdom
5.0

9 Aug 2024

Unbeatable for a micro business

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of, and sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. No complaints so far.

Pros

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for Less than 6 months18 found this helpful

Nicola Dunmore

Management accountant · 51-200 employees · Healthcare

United Kingdom
5.0

2 Aug 2024

Actually free, and it works

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid, and over four hundred integrations meant our shop connected fine. No complaints so far.

Pros

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid.

Cons

No payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Ease of use
5.0
Value for money
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 6-12 months30 found this helpful

Eleanor Whitfield

Founder · 1-10 employees · Professional services

United Kingdom
3.0

28 Jul 2024

Unbeatable for a micro business

Mixed. Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable, but it is functional rather than pleasant to look at.

Pros

Sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable.

Cons

It is functional rather than pleasant to look at.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
3.0
Customer service
3.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for 6-12 months20 found this helpful

Neil Trelawny

Sole trader · 11-50 employees · Charity and non-profit

United Kingdom
4.0

28 Jul 2024

Great value for a landlord

Over four hundred integrations meant our shop connected fine. Only real gripe is that the Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Pros

Over four hundred integrations meant our shop connected fine.

Cons

The Power User features sit behind a separate subscription.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 2+ years11 found this helpful

Andrew Wexford

Systems accountant · 501-1000 employees · Construction

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
4.0

27 Jul 2024

Sixty pounds a year, not a month

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of, and sixty pounds a year at the paid tier, not per month, is remarkable. The interface shows its age against Xero, but we live with it.

Pros

The developers answer on the forum themselves, which is unheard of.

Cons

The interface shows its age against Xero.

Ease of use
3.0
Value for money
4.0
Customer service
3.0
Functionality
5.0
Used for 1-2 years33 found this helpful

Robert Ferreira

Operations manager · 51-200 employees · Legal services

LinkedIn verifiedUnited Kingdom
3.0

24 Jul 2024

Does the job for nothing

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid. That said, the interface shows its age against Xero and no payroll, so we post a journal from elsewhere.

Pros

It is genuinely free below a thousand entries and we have never paid.

Cons

The interface shows its age against Xero.

Ease of use
4.0
Value for money
2.0
Customer service
4.0
Functionality
3.0
Used for Less than 6 months15 found this helpful